V petek, 27. 11. 2020, je v organizaciji Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani potekal Posvet o spreminjanju vrednotenja raziskovalne dejavnosti, na katerem je sodelovalo več domačih in tujih gostov. Posnetki prispevkov udeležencev posveta so objavljeni na YouTubu.
Med predavatelji bi posebej izpostavili Stephena Curryja, vodja usmerjevalnega odbora Sanfranciške deklaracije o vrednotenju raziskovalne dejavnosti (DORA), ki je predstavil bistvene probleme s trenutnim vrednotenjem znanosti in predlagal izboljšave. Ogledate si lahko posnetek njegovega predavanja, na voljo so tudi prosojnice.
Pet mitov o vrednotenju
Prilagamo še povezavi na dokumenta, v katerih so zgoščeno in pregledno povzete glavne zmote glede vrednotenja raziskovalne dejavnosti, ki ju je omenil tudi Curry v svoji predstavitvi:
- Ideas for Action outlines five common myths about research evaluation to help universities better understand barriers to change and provides analogous examples to illustrate how these myths exist inside and outside of academia. It also offers five design principles to help institutions experiment with and develop better research assessment practices.
Download (PDF): Rethinking Research Assessment: Ideas for Action - Unintended Cognitive and Systems Biases identifies seven personal biases that can influence hiring, promotion, and tenure decisions. It also reveals four institutional and infrastructural implications of these biases and provides strategies to develop new institutional conditions that reduce bias.
Download (PDF): Rethinking Research Assessment: Unintended Cognitive and System Biases
Nekaj povezav, ki so jih zbrali organizatorji posveta
- The changing role of funders in responsible research assessment: progress, obstacles and the way ahead
- Rethinking Research Assessment: Ideas for Action
- Rethinking Research Assessment: Unintended Cognitive and System Biases
- Good practices – Funders
- Good practices – Research Institutes
- Good practices – Professional Societies
- Vision statement for evaluating research at Ghent University, 2016, Using indicators in the evaluation of research, Portfolio of research dimensions
- Evaluation of Research Careers fully acknowledging Open Science Practices: Rewards, incentives and/or recognition for researchers practicing Open Science, 2017
- Next-generation metrics: Responsible metrics and evaluation for open science, 2017
- Mutual Learning Exercise on Open Science – Altmetrics and Rewards, 2018
- EUA Roadmap on Research Assessment in the Transition to Open Science, 2018
- Indicator Frameworks for Fostering Open Knowledge Practices in Science and Scholarship, 2019
- Research Assessment in the Transition to Open Science: 2019 EUA Open Science and Access Survey Results, 2019
- Science Europe Study on Research Assessment Practices: Final Report, 2019
- The European University Association and Science Europe Join Efforts to Improve Scholarly Research Assessment Methodologies, 2019
- Room for everyone’s talent: towards a new balance in the recognition and rewards of academics, 2019 [Nizozemska: VSNU, NFU, KNAW, NWO, ZonMw]
- Odgovorna raba metrike na UM, 2019 (PPT)
- [Science Europe] Position Statement and Recommendations on Research Assessment Processes, 2020
- Bonn Declaration on Freedom of Scientific Research [Ministrska konferenca o Evropskem raziskovalnem prostoru], 2020
- Zaključki delavnice »Kriteriji znanstvenega napredovanja v Sloveniji« – izsledki in priporočila, 2020
- Realising the European Open Science Cloud, 2020 [Slide 7: HE WP 2021-2022 – Topics overview: Open science practices and skills are rewarded and taught, becoming the ‘new normal’ – > Services and tools to underpin a research assessment system that incentivises open science practices]
